-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Description
Description
We currently have this:
The COSIMA Cookbook framework focuses on the ACCESS-OM2 suite of models being developed and run by members of COSIMA. Nevertheless, this framework is suited to analysing any MOM5/MOM6 output as well as output from other models.
I think that's slowly changing with some of the notebooks being updated to work with mom6 output?
Perhaps we could re-phrase with something like:
The COSIMA Cookbook framework focuses on ACCESS-OM2 and ACCESS-OM3 suite of models being developed and run by members of COSIMA and ACCESS-NRI. This framework demonstrates how to analyze output from MOM5/MOM6 and CICE5/CICE6.
I'm not sure if we should use the phrase "ACCESS-NRI does not own the code", how about something like:
The COSIMA Cookbook is developed and maintained by COSIMA. Whilst ACCESS-NRI does not contribute to the scientific scope of the code, it actively supports the use of the recipes within the COSIMA Cookbook on Gadi.
Finally, there's nothing on the page that suggests they would like contributors. Perhaps worth adding @navidcy, @hrsdawson or @adele-morrison? Feel free to suggest some wording.
Why
Slightly out of date.
Close Criteria
Chat through the above and implement changes if there's agreement.