Skip to content

um and CI - Do we keep it? #318

@CodeGat

Description

@CodeGat

See #317, specifically #317 (comment)

Background

um CI tests are currently failing (as well as anything that depends on the it) as it gets its stuff from a local path on Gadi. See https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/spack-packages/actions/runs/17404574596/job/49459311901?pr=317 for an example.

The tests should fail, as having a hardcoded path for resources will fail for anything other than Gadi (CI Tests, Setonix, etc). But is it too much noise for something that is a non-trivial fix, and should we just add on.pull_request.paths-ignore: [packages/um, packages/access-ram3, packages/access-am3] etc.?

Discuss! Pinging @aidanheerdegen

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions