-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathEXECUTIVE_REPORT.html
More file actions
635 lines (576 loc) · 18.9 KB
/
EXECUTIVE_REPORT.html
File metadata and controls
635 lines (576 loc) · 18.9 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>ReadmitRisk Executive Report</title>
<style>
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
font-family: 'Segoe UI', Tahoma, Geneva, Verdana, sans-serif;
line-height: 1.6;
color: #1a1a1a;
max-width: 8.5in;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0.75in;
}
h1 {
color: #1e40af;
font-size: 28px;
margin-bottom: 8px;
border-bottom: 3px solid #1e40af;
padding-bottom: 10px;
}
h2 {
color: #1e40af;
font-size: 20px;
margin-top: 30px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
border-bottom: 1px solid #ddd;
padding-bottom: 8px;
}
h3 {
color: #374151;
font-size: 16px;
margin-top: 20px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
p {
margin-bottom: 12px;
}
.subtitle {
color: #6b7280;
font-size: 14px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
}
.header-meta {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
margin-bottom: 30px;
padding: 15px;
background: #f3f4f6;
border-radius: 8px;
}
.header-meta div {
text-align: center;
}
.header-meta .value {
font-size: 24px;
font-weight: bold;
color: #1e40af;
}
.header-meta .label {
font-size: 12px;
color: #6b7280;
}
.kpi-grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: repeat(4, 1fr);
gap: 15px;
margin: 20px 0;
}
.kpi-card {
background: #f9fafb;
border: 1px solid #e5e7eb;
border-radius: 8px;
padding: 15px;
text-align: center;
}
.kpi-card .value {
font-size: 24px;
font-weight: bold;
}
.kpi-card .label {
font-size: 11px;
color: #6b7280;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.kpi-card.critical .value {
color: #dc2626;
}
.kpi-card.warning .value {
color: #f59e0b;
}
.kpi-card.success .value {
color: #059669;
}
.kpi-card.primary .value {
color: #1e40af;
}
table {
width: 100%;
border-collapse: collapse;
margin: 20px 0;
font-size: 13px;
}
th,
td {
padding: 10px 12px;
text-align: left;
border-bottom: 1px solid #e5e7eb;
}
th {
background: #f3f4f6;
font-weight: 600;
color: #374151;
}
tr:hover {
background: #f9fafb;
}
.highlight {
background: #fef3c7;
padding: 15px;
border-left: 4px solid #f59e0b;
margin: 20px 0;
border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0;
}
.highlight h4 {
color: #92400e;
margin-bottom: 8px;
}
.recommendation {
background: #dbeafe;
padding: 15px;
border-left: 4px solid #1e40af;
margin: 15px 0;
border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0;
}
.recommendation h4 {
color: #1e40af;
margin-bottom: 8px;
}
.footer {
margin-top: 40px;
padding-top: 20px;
border-top: 1px solid #e5e7eb;
text-align: center;
color: #6b7280;
font-size: 11px;
}
.page-break {
page-break-before: always;
}
ul {
margin-left: 20px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
}
li {
margin-bottom: 5px;
}
.risk-bar {
height: 20px;
background: #e5e7eb;
border-radius: 10px;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 10px 0;
}
.risk-fill {
height: 100%;
border-radius: 10px;
}
.two-col {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
gap: 30px;
}
@media print {
.new-page {
break-before: page;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<h1>ReadmitRisk Executive Report</h1>
<p class="subtitle">Hospital Readmission Risk Analysis and Cost Exposure Assessment</p>
<!-- Data Disclaimer -->
<div style="background: #fef3c7; border: 1px solid #f59e0b; border-left: 4px solid #f59e0b; padding: 12px 15px; margin-bottom: 20px; border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0;">
<p style="margin: 0; font-size: 12px; color: #92400e;">
<strong>Data Source Notice:</strong> This analysis uses the UCI Diabetes 130-US Hospitals dataset (1999-2008) for demonstration purposes. Risk patterns identified may differ from current clinical practice. Cost exposure figures are calculated using 2024 industry benchmarks ($15,000 average readmission cost). This report is intended for portfolio/demonstration purposes and should not be used for clinical decision-making.
</p>
</div>
<div class="header-meta">
<div>
<div class="value">71,518</div>
<div class="label">Total Patients Analyzed</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="value">7,083</div>
<div class="label">High-Risk Patients (60%+)</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="value">$78.5M</div>
<div class="label">Total Cost Exposure</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="value">8.8%</div>
<div class="label">Readmission Rate</div>
</div>
</div>
<h2>Executive Summary</h2>
<p>This report presents findings from our machine learning-based risk stratification analysis of 71,518 patients
from 130 US hospitals. The analysis identifies patients at elevated risk for 30-day hospital readmissions and
quantifies the associated cost exposure.</p>
<div class="highlight">
<h4>Key Finding</h4>
<p><strong>1,931 patients (2.7%)</strong> have critical risk scores above 80% and require immediate
intervention. These patients represent <strong>$25.1M in potential cost exposure</strong> and should be
prioritized for care management outreach.</p>
</div>
<h2>Risk Stratification Overview</h2>
<div class="kpi-grid">
<div class="kpi-card critical">
<div class="value">1,931</div>
<div class="label">Critical (80%+)</div>
</div>
<div class="kpi-card warning">
<div class="value">2,232</div>
<div class="label">Very High (70-80%)</div>
</div>
<div class="kpi-card primary">
<div class="value">2,920</div>
<div class="label">High (60-70%)</div>
</div>
<div class="kpi-card success">
<div class="value">64,435</div>
<div class="label">Moderate/Low (<60%)</div>
</div>
</div>
<h3>Cost Exposure by Risk Tier</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Risk Tier</th>
<th>Patient Count</th>
<th>Avg Risk Score</th>
<th>Total Cost Exposure</th>
<th>Avg Exposure/Patient</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Critical (80%+)</strong></td>
<td>1,931</td>
<td>86.6%</td>
<td>$25,096,147</td>
<td>$12,996</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Very High (70-80%)</strong></td>
<td>2,232</td>
<td>74.7%</td>
<td>$25,025,322</td>
<td>$11,212</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>High (60-70%)</strong></td>
<td>2,920</td>
<td>64.8%</td>
<td>$28,379,923</td>
<td>$9,719</td>
</tr>
<tr style="background: #f3f4f6; font-weight: bold;">
<td>Total High-Risk</td>
<td>7,083</td>
<td>73.9%</td>
<td>$78,501,392</td>
<td>$11,083</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2 class="page-break">Risk Factor Analysis</h2>
<p>The predictive model identified several key factors that significantly influence readmission risk:</p>
<div class="two-col">
<div>
<h3>Risk-Increasing Factors</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Factor</th>
<th>Impact</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Prior Visits</td>
<td style="color: #dc2626;">+4.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Number of Medications</td>
<td style="color: #dc2626;">+0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lab Procedures</td>
<td style="color: #dc2626;">+0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Number of Diagnoses</td>
<td style="color: #dc2626;">+0.01</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<div>
<h3>Protective Factors</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Factor</th>
<th>Impact</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Outpatient Visits</td>
<td style="color: #059669;">-3.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Prior Inpatient Visits</td>
<td style="color: #059669;">-1.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Emergency Visits</td>
<td style="color: #059669;">-1.54</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="highlight" style="margin-top: 30px;">
<h4>Clinical Interpretation</h4>
<p>Patients with high total healthcare utilization (visits, medications, diagnoses) face elevated readmission
risk, indicating complex care needs. However, outpatient follow-up care appears strongly protective,
suggesting that continuity of care and regular monitoring can mitigate readmission risk.</p>
</div>
<h2>Population Distribution</h2>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Risk Score Range</th>
<th>Patient Count</th>
<th>Percentage</th>
<th>Visual</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>0-20%</td>
<td>37,663</td>
<td>52.7%</td>
<td>
<div class="risk-bar">
<div class="risk-fill" style="width: 52.7%; background: #10b981;"></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>20-40%</td>
<td>17,548</td>
<td>24.5%</td>
<td>
<div class="risk-bar">
<div class="risk-fill" style="width: 24.5%; background: #84cc16;"></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>40-60%</td>
<td>9,224</td>
<td>12.9%</td>
<td>
<div class="risk-bar">
<div class="risk-fill" style="width: 12.9%; background: #eab308;"></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>60-80%</td>
<td>5,152</td>
<td>7.2%</td>
<td>
<div class="risk-bar">
<div class="risk-fill" style="width: 7.2%; background: #f97316;"></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>80-100%</td>
<td>1,931</td>
<td>2.7%</td>
<td>
<div class="risk-bar">
<div class="risk-fill" style="width: 2.7%; background: #dc2626;"></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2 class="page-break">Geographic Analysis</h2>
<p>Analysis of hospital readmission rates and CMS penalties across all 50 states reveals significant regional
variation:</p>
<h3>Top 10 States by Readmission Rate</h3>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Rank</th>
<th>State</th>
<th>Avg Readmission Rate</th>
<th>Hospitals</th>
<th>Est. Total Penalties</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>Louisiana</td>
<td>17.8%</td>
<td>109</td>
<td>$9,333,648</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2</td>
<td>West Virginia</td>
<td>17.6%</td>
<td>55</td>
<td>$3,411,907</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td>Mississippi</td>
<td>17.1%</td>
<td>83</td>
<td>$5,312,423</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4</td>
<td>Oklahoma</td>
<td>16.8%</td>
<td>112</td>
<td>$4,469,212</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td>Kentucky</td>
<td>16.1%</td>
<td>96</td>
<td>$9,231,976</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>6</td>
<td>Alabama</td>
<td>16.0%</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>$9,437,750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td>Maryland</td>
<td>16.0%</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>$2,726,538</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8</td>
<td>Missouri</td>
<td>16.0%</td>
<td>113</td>
<td>$4,391,642</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9</td>
<td>Tennessee</td>
<td>16.0%</td>
<td>116</td>
<td>$3,452,958</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>10</td>
<td>New York</td>
<td>15.9%</td>
<td>183</td>
<td>$9,471,439</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h3>National Summary</h3>
<div class="kpi-grid">
<div class="kpi-card primary">
<div class="value">51</div>
<div class="label">States Analyzed</div>
</div>
<div class="kpi-card primary">
<div class="value">4,692</div>
<div class="label">Total Hospitals</div>
</div>
<div class="kpi-card warning">
<div class="value">14.6%</div>
<div class="label">National Avg Rate</div>
</div>
<div class="kpi-card critical">
<div class="value">$153M</div>
<div class="label">Est. Total Penalties</div>
</div>
</div>
<h2>Recommended Interventions</h2>
<div class="recommendation">
<h4>1. Transitional Care Management (TCM)</h4>
<p><strong>Cost:</strong> $200-400 per patient | <strong>Effectiveness:</strong> 20-30% readmission reduction
</p>
<p>Structured post-discharge follow-up with medication reconciliation and care coordination. Best for patients
with complex conditions.</p>
</div>
<div class="recommendation">
<h4>2. Post-Discharge Phone Calls</h4>
<p><strong>Cost:</strong> $50-100 per patient | <strong>Effectiveness:</strong> 10-15% readmission reduction</p>
<p>Nurse-led calls within 48-72 hours of discharge to assess symptoms, medication adherence, and follow-up
appointment scheduling.</p>
</div>
<div class="recommendation">
<h4>3. Home Health Visits</h4>
<p><strong>Cost:</strong> $300-500 per patient | <strong>Effectiveness:</strong> 25-35% readmission reduction
</p>
<p>In-home nursing assessments for highest-risk patients with mobility or transportation barriers.</p>
</div>
<h2 class="page-break">ROI Analysis</h2>
<p>Potential return on investment for targeting the critical risk tier (1,931 patients):</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Scenario</th>
<th>Intervention Cost</th>
<th>Readmissions Prevented</th>
<th>Savings</th>
<th>Net ROI</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Conservative (15% reduction)</td>
<td>$386,200</td>
<td>290</td>
<td>$4,350,000</td>
<td style="color: #059669; font-weight: bold;">$3,963,800</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Moderate (25% reduction)</td>
<td>$579,300</td>
<td>483</td>
<td>$7,245,000</td>
<td style="color: #059669; font-weight: bold;">$6,665,700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aggressive (35% reduction)</td>
<td>$772,400</td>
<td>676</td>
<td>$10,140,000</td>
<td style="color: #059669; font-weight: bold;">$9,367,600</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="highlight">
<h4>Key Takeaway</h4>
<p>Even conservative intervention programs targeting the highest-risk patients can achieve <strong>10:1 or
greater ROI</strong> while improving patient outcomes and reducing CMS penalty exposure.</p>
</div>
<h2>Next Steps</h2>
<ol style="margin-left: 20px;">
<li style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Prioritize Critical Tier:</strong> Deploy care management resources to
the 1,931 patients with 80%+ risk scores immediately.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Implement TCM Program:</strong> Establish transitional care management
protocols for high-risk discharges.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Enhance Outpatient Follow-up:</strong> Given the protective effect of
outpatient visits, ensure follow-up appointments are scheduled before discharge.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Regional Focus:</strong> Concentrate quality improvement efforts in
states with highest readmission rates (Louisiana, West Virginia, Mississippi).</li>
<li style="margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Monitor and Iterate:</strong> Track intervention outcomes and refine
the predictive model quarterly.</li>
</ol>
<div class="footer">
<p><strong>ReadmitRisk</strong> | Hospital Readmission Prevention Platform</p>
<p>Report Generated: January 2026 | Data Source: UCI Diabetes Dataset (1999-2008) and CMS HRRP Patterns</p>
<p>Model Performance: AUC 0.564 | Cost Basis: $15,000 avg readmission (2024 benchmark)</p>
<p style="margin-top: 8px; font-style: italic;">This is a demonstration project. For production use, retrain on current EHR data.</p>
<p>Repository: github.com/NateDevIO/readmit-risk</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>