Hello!
From that what I can see the Thread and Zigbee SDK has similar directory structure as the nRF SDK, but some of the components are missing and some of components are present only in the former.
The contributing guide explains how to support a new library to use within the "normal" SDK. Most probably to use another SDK some extra steps should be made or the existing steps should be made in another way. I could even try to contribute to support the Thread and Zigbee SDK, but I need support from the authors to take a look at the current project structure and say whether the normal approach is fine or no.
To support the Thread and Zigbee SDK we would need most probably to make some changes in the definition of the cache variables.
What do you think about that?
Hello!
From that what I can see the Thread and Zigbee SDK has similar directory structure as the nRF SDK, but some of the components are missing and some of components are present only in the former.
The contributing guide explains how to support a new library to use within the "normal" SDK. Most probably to use another SDK some extra steps should be made or the existing steps should be made in another way. I could even try to contribute to support the Thread and Zigbee SDK, but I need support from the authors to take a look at the current project structure and say whether the normal approach is fine or no.
To support the Thread and Zigbee SDK we would need most probably to make some changes in the definition of the cache variables.
What do you think about that?