Skip to content

SOURCES.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
278 lines (173 loc) · 15.1 KB

SOURCES.md

File metadata and controls

278 lines (173 loc) · 15.1 KB
Raw

Research Sources & Citations

All claims in VOTER Protocol documentation are backed by peer-reviewed research, government data, or verifiable public records.

Democracy & Civic Participation

  1. Pew Research Center (2024, April 30). More than 80% of Americans believe elected officials don't care what people like them think. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/04/30/more-than-80-of-americans-believe-elected-officials-dont-care-what-people-like-them-think/

  2. Partnership for Public Service (2025). The State of Public Trust in Government 2025. https://ourpublicservice.org/publications/the-state-of-public-trust-in-government-2025/

  3. Pew Research Center (2023, September 19). Americans' Dismal Views of the Nation's Politics. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/09/19/americans-dismal-views-of-the-nations-politics/

  4. Tufts Now (2025, April 11). Most Young People Support Democracy, but Many Are Skeptical It Works for Them. https://now.tufts.edu/2025/04/11/most-young-people-support-democracy-many-are-skeptical-it-works-them

  5. Next100 and GenForward (2024, May). Young Adults Think America's Political System Isn't Working. New America. https://thenext100.org/young-adults-think-americas-political-system-isnt-working/

  6. Institute for Citizens & Scholars (2023, August). National Survey Finds Warning Signs For American Democracy In Civic Outlook Of Young Adults. https://citizensandscholars.org/national-survey-finds-warning-signs-for-democracy/

Attention Economy & Platform Competition

  1. Statista (2024). TikTok Content Engagement Rate 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1485224/tiktok-content-engagement/

  2. Number Analytics (2024). The Guide: Immediate Rewards Metrics in Behavior Economics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/immediate-rewards-behavioral-metrics-guide

  3. Al Jazeera (2025, January 20). Trump's new meme coin and crypto token soar on his first day in office. https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/1/20/trumps-new-meme-coin-and-crypto-token-soar-on-his-first-day-in-office

Surveillance Capitalism & Political Data

  1. OpenSecrets (2022, April). The third-party brokers who make millions selling your data to political groups. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/04/the-third-party-brokers-who-make-millions-selling-your-data-to-political-groups/

  2. FireTail (2024). Revisiting Cambridge Analytica in 2024. https://www.firetail.ai/blog/revisiting-cambridge-analytica-in-2024

  3. Penney, J. (2016). Chilling Effects: Online Surveillance and Wikipedia Use. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 31(1). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2769645

  4. Electronic Frontier Foundation (2016, May). Surveillance Chills Speech—As New Studies Show—And Free Association Suffers. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/when-surveillance-chills-speech-new-studies-show-our-rights-free-association

  5. Oxford Journal of Human Rights Practice (2024). Chilling Effects of Surveillance and Human Rights: Insights from Qualitative Research in Uganda and Zimbabwe. https://academic.oup.com/jhrp/article/16/1/397/7234270

  6. Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2022). The Chilling Effects of Digital Dataveillance: A Theoretical Model and an Empirical Research Agenda. Big Data & Society. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20539517211065368

  7. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

  8. Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4292299

  9. Harvard Kennedy School (2024). Announcing the Carr Center's 2024–2025 "Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy" Fellowship Cohort. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/carr/publications/announcing-carr-centers-2024-2025-surveillance-capitalism-or-democracy

  10. Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. Metropolitan Books.

Employment Discrimination & Doxxing

  1. Littler (2024). Politics in the Workplace: What Employers Need to Know. https://www.littler.com/news-analysis/asap/politics-workplace-what-employers-need-know

  2. SHRM. Can Workers Be Fired for Their Political Affiliation and Activity? https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/employment-law-compliance/fired-political-affiliation-activity

  3. SafeHome.org (2024). Doxxing Statistics in 2024. https://www.safehome.org/family-safety/doxxing-online-harassment-research/

  4. National Association of Attorneys General (2024). The Escalating Threats of Doxxing and Swatting: An Analysis of Recent Developments and Legal Responses. https://www.naag.org/attorney-general-journal/the-escalating-threats-of-doxxing-and-swatting-an-analysis-of-recent-developments-and-legal-responses/

  5. Institute for Strategic Dialogue (2024). Doxxing, threats and harassment: Intimidation toward election candidates in 2024 raises concerns in Ireland. https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-in-the-news/doxxing-threats-and-harassment-intimidation-toward-election-candidates-in-2024-raises-concerns-in-ireland/

  6. RAND Corporation (2022). The Relationship Between School Climate and Pandemic-Related Learning Experiences: Results from the 2022 AEP Survey. Research Report RRA1108-1. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1108-1.html

  7. National Education Association (2025). NEA-ACLU Lawsuit Challenges Trump's Anti-DEI "Dear Colleague" Letter. NEA Today. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/nea-aclu-lawsuit-challenges-trumps-anti-dei-dear-colleague-letter

  8. Corporate Compliance Insights (2024). Refresher on Workplace Social Media Policies as Contentious US Presidential Election Nears. https://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/refresher-workplace-social-media-policies-election-2024/

  9. NPR (2025, April 7). They had left their DEI roles. Trump still fired them. https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5348922/trump-dei-federal-employees-firing

Congressional Communication & Lobbying

  1. McDonald, S., Yin, F., & Mazmanian, M. (2020). Communications technology as symbols of institutional legitimacy in the U.S. congress. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17:4, 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1740907

  2. Fireside (2023). Congressional Constituent Communication Statistics 2022. https://www.fireside21.com/resources/congressional-staffer-communication/

  3. Congressional Management Foundation (archived 2025). Someone Really Reads Advocacy Emails - It's Just Not Who You Think. https://web.archive.org/web/20250528073829/https://www.congressfoundation.org/blog/1380

  4. Congressional Management Foundation (archived 2025). Legislative Correspondent Survey. https://web.archive.org/web/20250619130156/https://www.congressfoundation.org/lc-survey

  5. Congressional Management Foundation (archived 2025). Responding to Constituent Correspondence and the CMF. https://web.archive.org/web/20251028000000/https://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/SC119/sc_119_ch17_2024-cbk.pdf

  6. Congressional Management Foundation (archived 2025). It's Not How You Send It, It's What's Inside. https://web.archive.org/web/20250619124443/https://www.congressfoundation.org/blog/917-its-not-how-you-send-it-its-whats-inside

  7. Congressional Management Foundation (archived 2025). Life in Congress: Aligning Work and Life in the U.S. House and Senate. https://web.archive.org/web/20250405232711/https://www.congressfoundation.org/revitalizing-congress/life-in-congress/973-aligning-work-life-in-house-senate

  8. Statista (2024). Lobbying expenditure on pharmaceuticals and health products in the U.S. 2000-2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1377721/lobbying-spending-on-pharmaceuticals-and-health-products-in-the-us/

  9. OpenSecrets (2023, February). Despite record federal lobbying spending, the pharmaceutical and health product industry lost their biggest legislative bet in 2022. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2023/02/despite-record-federal-lobbying-spending-the-pharmaceutical-and-health-product-industry-lost-their-biggest-legislative-bet-in-2022/

  10. KFF (2025). FAQs about the Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program. https://www.kff.org/medicare/faqs-about-the-inflation-reduction-acts-medicare-drug-price-negotiation-program/

  11. Tucson Sentinel (2025, February 13). Record-breaking $4.4 billion spent on lobbying efforts in 2024. https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/nationworld/report/021325_lobbying_record/

  12. OpenSecrets. Layers of Lobbying: Federal and state lobbying trends in spending, representation and messaging. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/reports/layers-of-lobbying

  13. Inequality.org (2024). Shareholders Unite! Opportunities Ahead in 2025 to Increase Corporate Lobbying Transparency and Accountability. https://inequality.org/article/corporate-lobbying-transparency-and-accountability/

  14. The Commonwealth Fund (2022, January). International Prescription Drug Price Comparisons: Current Empirical Estimates and Comparisons with Previous Studies. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2022/jan/international-prescription-drug-price-comparisons

Cryptography & Zero-Knowledge Proofs

  1. Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rackoff, C. (1989). The Knowledge Complexity of Interactive Proof-Systems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 18(1), 186-208. https://people.csail.mit.edu/silvio/Selected%20Scientific%20Papers/Proof%20Systems/The_Knowledge_Complexity_Of_Interactive_Proof_Systems.pdf

  2. Gabizon, A., Williamson, Z. J., & Ciobotaru, O. (2019). PLONK: Permutations over Lagrange-bases for Oecumenical Noninteractive arguments of Knowledge. ePrint Archive. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/953

  3. Grassi, L., Khovratovich, D., Rechberger, C., Roy, A., & Schofnegger, M. (2019). Poseidon: A New Hash Function for Zero-Knowledge Proof Systems. ePrint Archive. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/458

  4. Bernstein, D. J., et al. XSalsa20 and XChaCha20: Extended-Nonce Variants. Libsodium Documentation. https://doc.libsodium.org/

Blockchain & Multi-Party Computation

  1. NEAR Foundation (2024). Chain Signatures: Cross-Chain Without Bridges. NEAR Protocol Documentation. https://docs.near.org/chain-abstraction/chain-signatures

  2. Gennaro, R., & Goldfeder, S. (2018). Fast Multiparty Threshold ECDSA with Fast Trustless Setup. ACM CCS. https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/114

Trusted Execution Environments

  1. Google Cloud (2025). Confidential Space Overview. Google Cloud Documentation. https://cloud.google.com/confidential-computing/confidential-space/docs/confidential-space-overview

  2. AMD (2025). AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP). AMD Developer Documentation. https://www.amd.com/en/developer/sev.html

  3. Microsoft Azure (2025). Azure Confidential Computing Attestation. Microsoft Azure Documentation. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/attestation/overview

Economic Mechanisms & Governance

  1. Buterin, V., Hitzig, Z., & Weyl, E.G. (2018). Liberal Radicalism: A Flexible Design for Philanthropic Matching Funds. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3243656

  2. BrightID Foundation. A Social Identity Network [Whitepaper]. https://www.brightid.org/whitepaper

  3. The Block (2024). Total Trading Volume on Polymarket (Daily). Polymarket Data. https://www.theblock.co/data/decentralized-finance/prediction-markets/total-trading-volume-on-polymarket-daily

  4. Liu, J., Makarov, I., & Schoar, A. (2023). Anatomy of a Run: The Terra Luna Crash. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2023/05/22/anatomy-of-a-run-the-terra-luna-crash/

  5. Briola, A., et al. (2023). Anatomy of a stablecoin's failure: The Terra-Luna case. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363790824_Anatomy_of_a_stablecoin's_failure_The_Terra-Luna_case

  6. Govind, V. (Medium). Building Antifragile DeFi: Why Smart Contracts Need to Get Smarter. https://vishnugovind10.medium.com/building-antifragile-defi-why-smart-contracts-need-to-get-smarter-6c87afb4085b

Multi-Agent Systems

  1. Li, X., Wang, S., Zeng, S., Wu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024). A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: workflow, infrastructure, and challenges. Vicinagearth, 1, Article 9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44336-024-00009-2

  2. MDPI Journals (2025). Multi-Agent Coordination in Decentralized Systems. Future Internet, 17(2), 57. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/2/57

Legal & Regulatory

  1. U.S. Congress (2025). H.R.3633 - Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025. 119th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3633/text

  2. Cornell Law School. 18 U.S.C. §597 - Expenditures to Influence Voting. Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/597

  3. House of Representatives. Communicating with Congress (CWC) Overview. https://www.house.gov/doing-business-with-the-house/communicating-with-congress-cwc

Identity Verification Infrastructure

  1. self.xyz. Self Identity Verification Platform. https://www.self.xyz

  2. Didit.me. Digital Identity Verification. https://www.didit.me

Cypherpunk Philosophy

  1. Hughes, E. (1993). A Cypherpunk's Manifesto. https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/manifesto.html

Recent ZK Protocol Developments

  1. Buterin, V. (2025, October 19). The GKR protocol. https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/10/19/gkr.html

  2. Buterin, V., Ashton, J., Buterin, L., Soleimani, A., Lesuisse, C., & Weyl, E.G. (2023). Blockchain Privacy and Regulatory Compliance: Towards a Practical Equilibrium. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4563364

  3. Polyhedra Network (2024). Introducing Expander: The Fastest GKR Proof System to Date. https://blog.polyhedra.network/introducing-expander-the-fastest-gkr-proof-system-to-date/

  4. Thaler, J. (Georgetown University). A Note on the GKR Protocol. https://people.cs.georgetown.edu/jthaler/GKRNote.pdf

Additional Context

All statistics, claims, and technical specifications in VOTER Protocol documentation trace to these sources. Where sources are paywalled or archived, we've provided web.archive.org mirrors where available.

For academic papers behind paywalls, contact [email protected] for assistance accessing research materials.

Last updated: October 2025

This documentation is open-source. If you find broken links or outdated citations, please submit issues to our GitHub repository.