Within the <publicationStmt> our files (or at least mine) now contain the following code:
<availability>
<licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported
Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View,
California, 94041, USA.</p>
<p>Copyright (c) 2019-2025 by Dániel Balogh.</p>
</licence>
</availability>
In the Roles, responsibilities... GDoc we have reached the following consensus.
- the above is to be replaced by
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability> (and nothing else), regardless of what text and what licence was specified in earlier files
- instead of the hard-coded copyright line, which we discard, a "soft" copyright line shall be generated in the display of editions on dharmalekha
If the PIs are still unanimous on this, we need @michaelnmmeyer to batch replace the existing instances of <availability> as above.
No decision has been reached concerning the content and the manner of generation of the soft copyright line.
If the use of @key on <resp> is finalised (as agreed in the Roles... gdoc and summarised by me in #458), then generation should be quite straightforward: the copyright holders are all of the people listed with <resp key="creator"> in the file. There will always have to be at least one of these, and all of them are expected to have DHARMA id-s, which can be extracted from the file and linked to our participant list. The text could be simply "Copyright © 2019-2026 by {NAME#1}[, {NAME#2}, ... {NAME#n}]." If absolute beauty is desired, then "and" instead of a comma might be used before the last name when there is more than one name.
If the PIs agree on this and @michaelnmmeyer says it is doable, then it needs to be implemented. Otherwise, we need discussion.
Within the
<publicationStmt>our files (or at least mine) now contain the following code:In the Roles, responsibilities... GDoc we have reached the following consensus.
<availability><licence target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</licence></availability>(and nothing else), regardless of what text and what licence was specified in earlier filesIf the PIs are still unanimous on this, we need @michaelnmmeyer to batch replace the existing instances of
<availability>as above.No decision has been reached concerning the content and the manner of generation of the soft copyright line.
If the use of
@keyon<resp>is finalised (as agreed in the Roles... gdoc and summarised by me in #458), then generation should be quite straightforward: the copyright holders are all of the people listed with<resp key="creator">in the file. There will always have to be at least one of these, and all of them are expected to have DHARMA id-s, which can be extracted from the file and linked to our participant list. The text could be simply "Copyright © 2019-2026 by {NAME#1}[, {NAME#2}, ... {NAME#n}]." If absolute beauty is desired, then "and" instead of a comma might be used before the last name when there is more than one name.If the PIs agree on this and @michaelnmmeyer says it is doable, then it needs to be implemented. Otherwise, we need discussion.