REVIEWER (arXiv lens): there is no comparison section, so novelty is hard to judge; the README only name-drops the SPDX/CycloneDX analogy. Add a table positioning AIREP's unit-of-evidence (one runtime DECISION with explicit does_not_cover) against asset-provenance (C2PA), build-provenance (in-toto/SLSA), component-inventory (SBOM/SPDX/CycloneDX), credential claims (W3C VC), and append-only witnesses (transparency logs — chain_witness composes with these). Keep claims Experimental-modest.
REVIEWER (arXiv lens): there is no comparison section, so novelty is hard to judge; the README only name-drops the SPDX/CycloneDX analogy. Add a table positioning AIREP's unit-of-evidence (one runtime DECISION with explicit does_not_cover) against asset-provenance (C2PA), build-provenance (in-toto/SLSA), component-inventory (SBOM/SPDX/CycloneDX), credential claims (W3C VC), and append-only witnesses (transparency logs — chain_witness composes with these). Keep claims Experimental-modest.