Reproducibility and Organization Feedback

[Eldave93]

Dear @ids-s1-21/TeamHull -- Below is the feedback for the reproducibility and organization of the assignment. Please review carefully, and contact the course organisers if you have any questions.

---

Assessment Rubric

Repository Organisation (1/2 points)

Are files well named and in sensible locations?

• Your presentation is in the "template" folder so not initally clear where it is. Otherwise a clean repository.

Effort (2/2 points)

Does it appear that time and effort went into the planning and implementation of the project? (i.e. files in extra folder)

• seems you did more work in the proposal than you mention in the summary or final project...

Code Style/Smell (3/4 points)

Is the code easy to follow, does it have a consistent style? Is the code well organized with clear variables and function names?

• Some parts of the code is hard to read (e.g. the group_by to create Weight_Issues_Edited) but generally pretty good.
• code would benefit from some code comments (#)

Reproduciblility/Replicability (2/2 points)

Does the code appear to be able to be run by others (e.g. no specific paths like "/cloud/project"), will they get the same results (e.g. seed set?).

Other

Scores

	Earned	Available
Repository Organisation	1	2
Effort	2	2
Code style/smell	3	4
Reproduciblility/Replicability	2	2
Other	0	-10
Total	8	10