Should expected constructor unwrap implicitly?

[viboes]

std::future constructor unwrap implicitly. I don't remember why this was decided. Should expected behave the same way?

[ptal]

Not sure about what you mean. How a constructor unwrap something?

[viboes]

I mean

expected<E,T>(expected<E, expected<E,T>>);

[ptal]

It might be useful and if it exists in std::future there surely are some useful cases for this.