#emptyFieldValue: not respected with #recordClass:

[seandenigris]

If #recordClass: is set, #emptyFieldValue: is ignored and nil values are stored.

[svenvc]

I am really in dubio about this. Right now the code in #readNextRecordAsObject seems to have been written to not assign empty fields to objects. The more I think about this, the more this makes sense, because a single value cannot be the default for all your fields. It seems better to solve unassigned properties inside the object itself.

Does this make sense ?