Description
I think ChOA also borders on plagiarism, it is very similar to GWO and the size determining position change of μ mentioned in the paper is not mentioned at all in the code provided by the authors and in the improvement paper published by the authors about ChOA.
Moreover, SOA can also be considered as plagiarized, which is almost identical to WOA.
Additional Information
No response
Description
I think ChOA also borders on plagiarism, it is very similar to GWO and the size determining position change of μ mentioned in the paper is not mentioned at all in the code provided by the authors and in the improvement paper published by the authors about ChOA.
Moreover, SOA can also be considered as plagiarized, which is almost identical to WOA.
Additional Information
No response