Open
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
# Conflicts: # package.json
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Static Code Analysis (readability, compactness):
Implements an abstract
OtpModulethat allows protecting specific external functions using OTP-based authentication via theonlyOTPmodifier. Logic is cleanly separated into helper methods for packing/unpacking and validating OTPs. Storage is optimized via tight packing of hash and counter into a singleuint256.Dynamic Code Analysis (external APIs, interaction flows):
The OTP flow requires the user to precompute and register a hash chain off-chain. The protected function must explicitly use the
onlyOTPmodifier, OTPs are not enforced globally. Each successful call consumes one code (k_i) validated askeccak256(k_i | user), and updates the internal state for the next expected hash. Since the sender's address (msg.sender) is included in the hash, OTP codes are user-specific and cannot be front-run or reused by other accounts.Efficiency (gas costs, computational complexity, memory requirements):
Opinion, trade-offs and other thoughts (optional):
The design is intentionally minimal and opt-in, only functions explicitly decorated with
onlyOTPare protected. Security/gas trade-off of using 224-bit hashes is considered acceptable given the context (one-time, user-specific keys).