-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Ingress tests for pods #931
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feature/swiftv2GA/swiftv2scale
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Ingress tests for pods #931
Conversation
miguelgoms
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please revert commented tests on the matrix before merging.
| - | | ||
| set -e | ||
| MY_INDEX=${POD_INDEX} | ||
| TARGET_INDEX=$((MY_INDEX + 1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will fail for the last pod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's handled in line 159, but I have added more deterministic way to identify that pod now.
| name: generate_id | ||
| - job: generate_run_id | ||
| displayName: "Generate Base Run ID" | ||
| steps: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think there is any diff in this step right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, no difference. I will revert back the changes
30541a1 to
9c66ff3
Compare
No description provided.