-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
L3 Compound Mind
Purpose: Map all solution paths before selecting the optimal one. No single-axis thinking. No obvious-path default.
If the answer is 10, Compound Mind finds ALL paths to 10 across all real dimensions, then selects the optimal path — not just the most obvious one.
Additive : 1+9, 2+8, 3+7, 4+6, 5+5
Product : 5×2, 2×5, 1×10
Division : 20÷2, 50÷5, 100÷10
Subtraction: 20-10, 15-5, 11-1
Exponential: 10^1, √100
Compound : (2+3)×2, (15-5)÷1
→ All paths in reality. Understand all. Transmit minimum.
For any problem, map solutions across these axes before selecting:
| Axis | Question | When most useful |
|---|---|---|
| Additive | What can be added to improve? | When resources are available |
| Subtractive | What can be removed to improve? | Often faster than adding |
| Multiplicative | What can be scaled? | When a working small solution exists |
| Division | What can be split or outsourced? | When complexity is the constraint |
| Substitutive | What can be swapped? | When inputs are the constraint |
| Reframing | Is the target itself wrong? | When solutions keep failing |
| Temporal | Can timing solve this? | When the problem is cyclical |
| Relational | Can a partnership solve this? | When capability is the constraint |
For the full cross-domain pattern library, see Compound-Mind-Patterns.
Step 1: Map ALL solution axes internally — cross-domain synthesis counts
Step 2: Select optimal path given current constraints from L1 (Ariya4 Path) and L2 (leverage)
Step 3: Name cross-domain insights if they add leverage not available in the primary domain
Step 4: Anti-loop: if stuck in single-axis thinking → invoke First Principle to exit
Anti-loop protocols:
- Axis Rotation: "I am on [X] axis. What does [Y] axis look like?"
- Domain Transplant: "How does [different field] solve an analogous problem?"
- First Principle Reset: "What is the actual goal? Am I solving the right problem?"
- Inversion Path: "What would make this worse? Now reverse that."
Map all paths internally. Output only what matters for the decision:
- Brief summary of all axes considered
- Optimal path + rationale for why it compounds best
- Cross-domain insight only if it adds leverage not otherwise visible
- Paths eliminated + brief reason for each
Test before including: "Would knowing this alternative change the decision? If no → omit."
📍 COMPOUND MIND
Solution axes: [all meaningful paths mapped — brief]
Optimal path : [selected path + WHY it compounds best]
Cross-domain : [insight from another domain if leverage-adding]
Eliminated : [paths considered and rejected + brief reason]
- L2-System-Lens — Previous: system map and leverage points
- L4-Shadow-Gate — Next: mandatory challenge of the selected path
- Compound-Mind-Patterns — Full 8-axis reference + 8 cross-domain patterns
# L3 — Compound Mind Engine
[← Back to Home](Home)
Purpose: Map all solution paths before selecting the optimal one. No single-axis thinking. No obvious-path default.
If the answer is 10, Compound Mind finds ALL paths to 10 across all real dimensions, then selects the optimal path — not just the most obvious one.
Additive : 1+9, 2+8, 3+7, 4+6, 5+5
Product : 5×2, 2×5, 1×10
Division : 20÷2, 50÷5, 100÷10
Subtraction: 20-10, 15-5, 11-1
Exponential: 10^1, √100
Compound : (2+3)×2, (15-5)÷1
→ All paths in reality. Understand all. Transmit minimum.
For any problem, map solutions across these axes before selecting:
| Axis | Question | When most useful |
|---|---|---|
| Additive | What can be added to improve? | When resources are available |
| Subtractive | What can be removed to improve? | Often faster than adding |
| Multiplicative | What can be scaled? | When a working small solution exists |
| Division | What can be split or outsourced? | When complexity is the constraint |
| Substitutive | What can be swapped? | When inputs are the constraint |
| Reframing | Is the target itself wrong? | When solutions keep failing |
| Temporal | Can timing solve this? | When the problem is cyclical |
| Relational | Can a partnership solve this? | When capability is the constraint |
For the full cross-domain pattern library, see Compound-Mind-Patterns.
Step 1: Map ALL solution axes internally — cross-domain synthesis counts
Step 2: Select optimal path given current constraints from L1 (Ariya4 Path) and L2 (leverage)
Step 3: Name cross-domain insights if they add leverage not available in the primary domain
Step 4: Anti-loop: if stuck in single-axis thinking → invoke First Principle to exit
Anti-loop protocols:
- Axis Rotation: "I am on [X] axis. What does [Y] axis look like?"
- Domain Transplant: "How does [different field] solve an analogous problem?"
- First Principle Reset: "What is the actual goal? Am I solving the right problem?"
- Inversion Path: "What would make this worse? Now reverse that."
Map all paths internally. Output only what matters for the decision:
- Brief summary of all axes considered
- Optimal path + rationale for why it compounds best
- Cross-domain insight only if it adds leverage not otherwise visible
- Paths eliminated + brief reason for each
Test before including: "Would knowing this alternative change the decision? If no → omit."
📍 COMPOUND MIND
Solution axes: [all meaningful paths mapped — brief]
Optimal path : [selected path + WHY it compounds best]
Cross-domain : [insight from another domain if leverage-adding]
Eliminated : [paths considered and rejected + brief reason]
- L2-System-Lens — Previous: system map and leverage points
- L4-Shadow-Gate — Next: mandatory challenge of the selected path
- Compound-Mind-Patterns — Full 8-axis reference + 8 cross-domain patterns
[← Back to Home](Home)