Skip to content

Conversation

@rartino
Copy link
Contributor

@rartino rartino commented Dec 19, 2022

Resolves #419 which we found to be blocking for #386 and probably should be addressed for the v1.2 release planning (#429)

@rartino rartino requested review from jvita, merkys and ml-evs December 19, 2022 09:53
Copy link
Member

@ml-evs ml-evs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rartino, this seems clear enough to me.

Copy link
Member

@merkys merkys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is exactly how I had understood it before, but later on found that JSON:API did not contain such constraint. Anyway, I see benefit in adding such constraint, thanks for creating a PR for that.

@rartino rartino merged commit 4dd13b5 into Materials-Consortia:develop Dec 19, 2022
@rartino rartino mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2022
@ml-evs ml-evs added this to the v1.2 milestone Dec 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Specification unclear on the key to use in JSON:API relationships

3 participants