Fancier/More Professional README.md Heading

[silaspuma]

Description

Hi! this pr updates the README heading to make it look more modern/professional. idk, it’s a small change but it looks better in my opinion - ty!

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

N/A — no code changes

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have added screenshots if UI has been changed
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Refreshed README header with a modern, centered layout and improved visual hierarchy.
  • Increased logo size and refined typography (larger fonts, stronger weights) for clearer scanning.
  • Consolidated intro description into a single emphasized paragraph to enhance readability across screen sizes.
  • Visual update only; no functional changes to the project.

[netlify]

👷 Deploy request for appcut pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0ffce45

[vercel]

@silaspuma is attempting to deploy a commit to the OpenCut OSS Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The README header was refactored from a table-based layout to a centered div with inline CSS. It updates image size, typography, and consolidates descriptive text into a single styled paragraph. No code, APIs, or functional components were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Docs layout refactor README.md	Replaced table header with flexbox-style <div> and inline CSS; increased logo size; adjusted font sizes/weights; consolidated description into one styled <p>; no functional changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A bunny nibbles docs at dawn,
Tables hop out, divs hop on—
Logos larger, fonts in tune,
Paragraphs dance, a tidy swoon.
With whiskers twitched and CSS neat,
The README’s rhythm finds its beat.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The description loosely follows the template but leaves the “Fixes # (issue)” placeholder unresolved, omits concrete test details or configuration under “How Has This Been Tested,” and does not include a dedicated “Screenshots” or “Additional context” section, so several required template sections remain incomplete.	Please fill in or remove the empty “Fixes #” line with a proper issue reference, provide actual test information or explicitly state why testing isn’t applicable, and add a “Screenshots” or “Additional context” section if relevant.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title clearly reflects that the README heading has been enhanced to appear more professional and visually polished, capturing the essence of the documentation update. It directly references the README without listing multiple files or using vague terms, making the primary change easily identifiable at a glance.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

1-17: Inline HTML styles won’t render on GitHub

GitHub’s Markdown sanitizer strips style="…" attributes, so the new typography, margins, and colors will be lost in the rendered README. Consider reworking this header using plain Markdown (e.g., centered badges via <p align="center"> plus standard # OpenCut heading) or other GitHub-safe constructs so the intended presentation actually appears.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a346bdf and 0ffce45.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)