small changes#996
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
WalkthroughThis PR consolidates NFT URI validation by extracting a hardcoded 512-byte limit to a shared constant, and refactors keypairs module code for consistency. Includes minor documentation updates to Python environment setup instructions. ChangesNFT URI Constant Consolidation
Keypairs Module Refactoring & Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 3❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 52 minutes and 31 seconds.Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@xrpl/constants.py`:
- Around line 85-88: The docstring for the constant MAX_NFT_URI_LENGTH is
incorrect about units: update the docstring for MAX_NFT_URI_LENGTH to state that
512 is a hex-character limit (not bytes) and optionally note it corresponds to
256 bytes (256 bytes × 2 hex chars/byte) to match the XRPL spec and downstream
error messages; locate the constant MAX_NFT_URI_LENGTH in xrpl/constants.py and
replace the "in bytes" wording with "in hex characters (corresponds to 256
bytes)".
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: e8676709-0e2d-4f25-8f7f-0371d36a8020
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
CONTRIBUTING.mdxrpl/constants.pyxrpl/core/keypairs/ed25519.pyxrpl/core/keypairs/helpers.pyxrpl/core/keypairs/secp256k1.pyxrpl/models/transactions/nftoken_mint.pyxrpl/models/transactions/nftoken_modify.py
High Level Overview of Change
just looking at the state of repo and noticed a few easy changes :)
Context of Change
Type of Change
Did you update CHANGELOG.md?
Test Plan