[MINOR][PYTHON][DOCS] Improve PySpark contributing documentation wording#56821
Open
Israelobuk wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[MINOR][PYTHON][DOCS] Improve PySpark contributing documentation wording#56821Israelobuk wants to merge 1 commit into
Israelobuk wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes a few grammar issues in the PySpark contributing documentation.
Why are the changes needed?
The current wording contains a few minor grammar issues, including phrases such as "This release candidates", "generate the documentations", and "raise a API request". This update improves readability without changing the technical meaning of the documentation.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This is a documentation-only change and does not change runtime behavior.
How was this patch tested?
Ran:
git diff --check
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No