Skip to content

Conversation

@HarshMN2345
Copy link
Member

@HarshMN2345 HarshMN2345 commented Jan 12, 2026

What does this PR do?

before
image

after
image

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work.)

Related PRs and Issues

(If this PR is related to any other PR or resolves any issue or related to any issue link all related PR and issues here.)

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

(Write your answer here.)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Pricing Updates
    • Removed the "Limit of two projects. Never paused." caption from the Free plan display on the pricing page.
    • Removed the "Projects pausing" row from the pricing comparison table to simplify plan comparisons.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Walkthrough

Two pricing page components were modified to remove rendered UI elements. In src/routes/pricing/+page.svelte the horizontal rule and the caption paragraph ("Limit of two projects. Never paused.") were removed from the Free card. In src/routes/pricing/compare-plans.svelte the table row titled "Projects pausing" (with values like "Never") was removed from the plan comparison table. No other logic or exported entities were changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix: removed references' is vague and does not clearly describe the specific changes made, which involve removing UI elements related to project pausing limits from pricing pages. Revise the title to be more specific about what was removed and from where, such as 'fix: remove project pausing references from pricing pages' or similar to clarify the actual changes.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f80b439 and 47088e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/routes/pricing/+page.svelte
  • src/routes/pricing/compare-plans.svelte
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • src/routes/pricing/compare-plans.svelte
  • src/routes/pricing/+page.svelte
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: assets
  • GitHub Check: tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Comment on lines 94 to 100
// {
// title: 'Projects pausing',
// free: 'Never',
// pro: 'Never',
// scale: 'Never',
// enterprise: 'Never'
// },
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets just remove it. if we want we can always re-add it or just check git history.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/routes/pricing/+page.svelte (1)

129-135: Consider removing commented-out code instead of leaving it in place.

Git history preserves removed code, so commenting out is unnecessary. If this removal is intentional and permanent, deleting these lines entirely would keep the codebase cleaner.

♻️ Suggested cleanup
                                            </ul>
-                                            <!-- <hr
-                                                class="mt-4 mb-4 border-t border-gray-600 opacity-12"
-                                            /> -->
-                                            <!-- <p class="text-caption text-secondary font-small">
-                                                Limit of two projects.<br />
-                                                Never paused.
-                                            </p> -->
                                        </div>
src/routes/pricing/compare-plans.svelte (1)

94-100: Consider removing commented-out code instead of leaving it in place.

Same as the other file — git history preserves this data. If the "Projects pausing" row is being permanently removed, delete these lines entirely rather than commenting them out.

♻️ Suggested cleanup
                     enterprise: 'Custom'
                 },
-                // {
-                //     title: 'Projects pausing',
-                //     free: 'Never',
-                //     pro: 'Never',
-                //     scale: 'Never',
-                //     enterprise: 'Never'
-                // },
                 {
                     title: 'Organization members',
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3df6f1 and f80b439.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/routes/pricing/+page.svelte
  • src/routes/pricing/compare-plans.svelte
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: assets

@HarshMN2345 HarshMN2345 merged commit 9f28d54 into main Jan 13, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants