Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added input sanitization for deprecatedMessage values from service models before they are emitted into generated C# code. #4359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: development
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Added input sanitization for deprecatedMessage values from service models before they are emitted into generated C# code. #4359
Changes from all commits
8d19a8dFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if this approach using a json file can be simplified by just testing that the method works as intended by testing it with a string. Is there a reason a json file was chosen like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right now the only way to verify the generator works is by running against the real models (these unit tests don't run anywhere in our build system, and I think they were broken for quite some time).
So for now I'd say let's just included the
generator/ServiceClientGeneratorLib/changes in the PR. Also, I assume we'd need to do the same for V3?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i did run locally by manually updating one of the service json files, i just havent updated the PR description yet. and yeah i will also need to do same for v3
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.