Skip to content

Conversation

@jadonamite
Copy link

This PR adds a comprehensive guide to replacing "Renounced Ownership" with verifiable "TimeLock" architectures.

Content:

Architecture Comparison: Table comparing Renounce vs. Multisig vs. TimeLock.

Code: Full SecureToken.sol implementation using AccessControl.

Deployment: Hardhat script to deploy and link a TimelockController correctly.

Verification: Step-by-step instructions for users to verify admin roles and liquidity locks on Basescan.

Why: To encourage a shift towards professional, upgradable security standards on Base, reducing the risk of dead/abandoned projects caused by premature ownership renouncement.

Added a comprehensive guide on token launch security, focusing on TimeLock and AccessControl mechanisms to enhance trust and flexibility in smart contract ownership.
@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Collaborator

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 🟡 0/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants