Skip to content

feat: add mobile responsive layout for screens under 768px#41

Open
thephez wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
feat/mobile-improvements
Open

feat: add mobile responsive layout for screens under 768px#41
thephez wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
feat/mobile-improvements

Conversation

@thephez
Copy link
Collaborator

@thephez thephez commented Feb 5, 2026

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 noreply@anthropic.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Improved mobile responsiveness for screens up to 768px: refined header layout and typography, streamlined navigation and link sizing, reorganized main container and sidebar for single-column flow, adjusted result and action areas for wrapping and spacing, optimized form field and button sizing, and tuned banners and status displays for better small-screen presentation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a mobile-responsive CSS block for screens ≤768px, modifying layout, spacing, sizing, and wrapping for header, navigation, app container, sidebar, result UI, form fields, and action buttons. (Purely presentational CSS changes.)

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Mobile responsive styling
public/index.css
Introduces an @media (max-width: 768px) block (~94 lines) that adjusts header wrapping and font sizes, normalizes version-info, reflows header-nav and links, switches app layout to column, makes sidebar full-width with visible overflow, alters result-container min-height and result-header padding/wrapping, updates result-actions/button sizing and spacing, modifies status-banner height/padding, reflows where-field-group/where-value-input/operator-select and nonce-value widths, sets field-group labels to block with width changes, and reduces execute-button padding/font-size. All changes are presentational CSS only.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title accurately and concisely describes the main change: adding mobile responsive CSS layout for screens under 768px.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/mobile-improvements

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@public/index.css`:
- Around line 839-854: The .result-actions rule sets flex-wrap and gap but lacks
display:flex, so those properties don't apply; update the .result-actions
selector to make it a flex container (e.g., add display: flex) so gap and
flex-wrap take effect and the .result-actions button spacing behaves correctly.
- Around line 799-823: The .header h1 currently uses white-space: nowrap which
can force horizontal scrolling on narrow screens; update the .header h1 rule to
enable truncation by adding overflow handling (e.g., overflow: hidden and
text-overflow: ellipsis) and ensure it has a constrained width inside the flex
container (use max-width or allow it to shrink via flex: 1 1 auto on .header h1
or .header children) so long titles truncate with an ellipsis instead of causing
the header to overflow.

…esult actions

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant