Fix/discrepancy get started#462
Open
tremblap wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
tedmoore
approved these changes
May 22, 2026
Member
|
I would change the surface but not the underlying link. That way we can depend on any existing URLs working. I suspect the CCE packages link to it, so worth keeping the same IMO. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An astute web user pointed at me that we were using Getting Started and Get Started inconsistently within our site. This corrects that. Asking mature web designer for opinions... and if we should put a simlink from the old addresses (https://learn.flucoma.org/learn/getting-started/ and https://learn.flucoma.org/getting-started/) to the new ones (https://learn.flucoma.org/learn/get-started/ and https://learn.flucoma.org/get-started/)
The other option is the first commit of this PR, which changes only the UX side, but not the structure/link of the site.
let the vote begin :)