Skip to content

Conversation

@trasnake87
Copy link

Summary

This PR introduces p/demo/ui/md, a markdown generation framework for Gno.

Submission for bounty #2753

Features

  • Builder pattern with method chaining
  • Standalone functions for composition
  • Full markdown support
  • 80%+ test coverage

Demo

Updated r/demo/userbook and r/demo/microblog.

Resolves #2753

Add a new markdown generation library that provides an idiomatic Gno API
for programmatically generating markdown content. This addresses the need
for a cleaner alternative to manual string concatenation.

Features:
- Builder pattern with method chaining (md.New().H1().P().Bullet()...)
- Standalone functions for simple composition (md.Bold(), md.Link(), etc.)
- Full markdown support: headers, paragraphs, lists (bullet/numbered/checklist),
  tables, code blocks, blockquotes, horizontal rules, inline formatting
- Comprehensive test coverage (80%+)

Updated r/demo/userbook and r/demo/microblog to demonstrate practical usage
of the new library, replacing manual string concatenation with cleaner,
more maintainable code.

Resolves gnolang#2753

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Gno2D2
Copy link
Collaborator

Gno2D2 commented Feb 5, 2026

🛠 PR Checks Summary

🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
  • The pull request description provides enough details
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🔴 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: trasnake87/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🔴 Requirement not satisfied
└── 🔴 If
    ├── 🔴 Condition
    │   └── 🔴 Or
    │       ├── 🔴 At least one of these user(s) reviewed the pull request: [jefft0 notJoon omarsy MikaelVallenet] (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🔴 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🔴 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🔴 Else
        └── 🔴 And
            ├── 🟢 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending
            └── 🔴 On no pull request

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission
The pull request description provides enough details

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: core-contributors)
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is user: dependabot[bot])

Can be checked by

  • team core-contributors

@trasnake87 trasnake87 marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2026 06:29
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 added the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Feb 5, 2026
@notJoon
Copy link
Member

notJoon commented Feb 5, 2026

Note that concatenating strings with + is way more cheaper than using string.Builder in gno

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages. review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Markdown/UI templating framework competition

3 participants