Skip to content

Fix module reference in DAG example#5335

Open
therealgglggl wants to merge 1 commit intogruntwork-io:mainfrom
therealgglggl:patch-5
Open

Fix module reference in DAG example#5335
therealgglggl wants to merge 1 commit intogruntwork-io:mainfrom
therealgglggl:patch-5

Conversation

@therealgglggl
Copy link
Contributor

@therealgglggl therealgglggl commented Jan 11, 2026

output.tf should be under foo folder since foo is providing the output

Description

Fixes #000.

TODOs

Read the Gruntwork contribution guidelines.

  • I authored this code entirely myself
  • I am submitting code based on open source software (e.g. MIT, MPL-2.0, Apache)]
  • I am adding or upgrading a dependency or adapted code and confirm it has a compatible open source license
  • Update the docs.
  • Run the relevant tests successfully, including pre-commit checks.
  • Include release notes. If this PR is backward incompatible, include a migration guide.

Release Notes (draft)

Added / Removed / Updated [X].

Migration Guide

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated quick start guide examples to ensure accuracy and consistency with current system structure.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

output.tf should be under foo folder since foo is providing the output
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 11, 2026

@therealgglggl is attempting to deploy a commit to the Gruntwork Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation file updated to change a dependency example from the shared module to the foo module, including corresponding updates to output block file paths and accompanying commentary.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Getting Started Documentation
docs-starlight/src/content/docs/01-getting-started/01-quick-start.mdx
Updated dependency example references from shared module to foo module; output block path changed from shared/output.tf to foo/output.tf with related path commentary adjustments

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • denis256
  • yhakbar
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: fixing a module reference in a DAG example by moving output.tf to the correct foo module folder.
Description check ✅ Passed The description includes the template structure with sections for Description, TODOs, and Release Notes, though some sections lack detail.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs-starlight/src/content/docs/01-getting-started/01-quick-start.mdx (1)

365-372: Minor clarity tweak: “foo unit” vs “foo module”

Since the Terraform source is ../shared, calling foo a “module” here may be confusing—foo is the Terragrunt unit. Consider adjusting the sentence to make that explicit.

Proposed doc tweak
-For example, let's say that the `content` of the `bar` unit depended on the `content` of the `foo` unit. You can express this dependency first by adding an `output` block to the `foo` module:
+For example, let's say that the `content` of the `bar` unit depended on the `content` of the `foo` unit. You can express this dependency first by adding an `output` block to the Terraform configuration for the `foo` unit (e.g., `foo/output.tf`):
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0a2f68 and aaa949b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-starlight/src/content/docs/01-getting-started/01-quick-start.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs-starlight/**/*.md*

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

Review the documentation for clarity, grammar, and spelling. Make sure that the documentation is easy to understand and follow. There is currently a migration underway from the Jekyll based documentation in docs to the Starlight + Astro based documentation in docs-starlight. Make sure that the docs-starlight documentation is accurate and up-to-date with the docs documentation, and that any difference between them results in an improvement in the docs-starlight documentation.

Files:

  • docs-starlight/src/content/docs/01-getting-started/01-quick-start.mdx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant