test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having test clear_facts before include_role#211
Merged
richm merged 1 commit intolinux-system-roles:mainfrom Mar 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideTest playbooks now invoke the tlog role via a shared helper task file that clears Ansible facts before each role run, ensuring the role gathers required facts itself and supporting optional public variable export and controlled failure handling. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- Switching from
roles:/import_roletoinclude_tasks: run_role_with_clear_facts.ymlchanges the defaultpublicbehavior of the role, so it’s worth double-checking all call sites that rely on role-exported variables and explicitly pass__sr_public: truethere (or set a default insiderun_role_with_clear_facts.yml). - The
debugin the rescue block ofrun_role_with_clear_facts.ymlwill fire on every ignored failure and may add a lot of noise to test output; consider adding averbosityparameter or a more concise message so failures are still traceable without overwhelming logs.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- Switching from `roles:`/`import_role` to `include_tasks: run_role_with_clear_facts.yml` changes the default `public` behavior of the role, so it’s worth double-checking all call sites that rely on role-exported variables and explicitly pass `__sr_public: true` there (or set a default inside `run_role_with_clear_facts.yml`).
- The `debug` in the rescue block of `run_role_with_clear_facts.yml` will fire on every ignored failure and may add a lot of noise to test output; consider adding a `verbosity` parameter or a more concise message so failures are still traceable without overwhelming logs.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Contributor
Author
|
[citest] |
Contributor
Author
|
[citest] |
…s before include_role The role gathers the facts it uses. For example, if the user uses `ANSIBLE_GATHERING=explicit`, the role uses the `setup` module with the facts and subsets it requires. This change allows us to test this. Before every role invocation, the test will use `meta: clear_facts` so that the role starts with no facts. Create a task file tests/tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml to do the tasks to clear the facts and run the role. Note that this means we don't need to use `gather_facts` for the tests. Some vars defined using `ansible_facts` have been changed to be defined with `set_fact` instead. This is because of the fact that `vars` are lazily evaluated - the var might be referenced when the facts have been cleared, and will issue an error like `ansible_facts["distribution"] is undefined`. This is typically done for blocks that have a `when` condition that uses `ansible_facts` and the block has a role invocation using run_role_with_clear_facts.yml These have been rewritten to define the `when` condition using `set_fact`. This is because the `when` condition is evaluated every time a task is invoked in the block, and if the facts are cleared, this will raise an undefined variable error. Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
Contributor
Author
|
[citest] |
Contributor
Author
|
[citest_bad] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The role gathers the facts it uses. For example, if the user uses
ANSIBLE_GATHERING=explicit, the role uses thesetupmodule with thefacts and subsets it requires.
This change allows us to test this. Before every role invocation, the test
will use
meta: clear_factsso that the role starts with no facts.Create a task file tests/tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml to do the tasks
to clear the facts and run the role. Note that this means we don't need to
use
gather_factsfor the tests.Some vars defined using
ansible_factshave been changed to be defined withset_factinstead. This is because of the fact thatvarsare lazilyevaluated - the var might be referenced when the facts have been cleared, and
will issue an error like
ansible_facts["distribution"] is undefined. This istypically done for blocks that have a
whencondition that usesansible_factsand the block has a role invocation using run_role_with_clear_facts.yml
These have been rewritten to define the
whencondition usingset_fact. Thisis because the
whencondition is evaluated every time a task is invoked in theblock, and if the facts are cleared, this will raise an undefined variable error.
Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com
Summary by Sourcery
Use a shared task file to run the tlog role after clearing Ansible facts so tests verify the role gathers all required facts itself.
Tests: