Skip to content

test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having test clear_facts before include_role#211

Merged
richm merged 1 commit intolinux-system-roles:mainfrom
richm:clear_facts
Mar 20, 2026
Merged

test: ensure role gathers the facts it uses by having test clear_facts before include_role#211
richm merged 1 commit intolinux-system-roles:mainfrom
richm:clear_facts

Conversation

@richm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@richm richm commented Mar 20, 2026

The role gathers the facts it uses. For example, if the user uses
ANSIBLE_GATHERING=explicit, the role uses the setup module with the
facts and subsets it requires.

This change allows us to test this. Before every role invocation, the test
will use meta: clear_facts so that the role starts with no facts.

Create a task file tests/tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml to do the tasks
to clear the facts and run the role. Note that this means we don't need to
use gather_facts for the tests.

Some vars defined using ansible_facts have been changed to be defined with
set_fact instead. This is because of the fact that vars are lazily
evaluated - the var might be referenced when the facts have been cleared, and
will issue an error like ansible_facts["distribution"] is undefined. This is
typically done for blocks that have a when condition that uses ansible_facts
and the block has a role invocation using run_role_with_clear_facts.yml
These have been rewritten to define the when condition using set_fact. This
is because the when condition is evaluated every time a task is invoked in the
block, and if the facts are cleared, this will raise an undefined variable error.

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson rmeggins@redhat.com

Summary by Sourcery

Use a shared task file to run the tlog role after clearing Ansible facts so tests verify the role gathers all required facts itself.

Tests:

  • Replace direct role/import_role usage in tlog test playbooks with a helper task file that clears facts then runs the role, optionally exposing public variables.
  • Stop relying on play-level gather_facts in tests_default.yml, instead invoking the role via the new run_role_with_clear_facts.yml helper.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 20, 2026

Reviewer's Guide

Test playbooks now invoke the tlog role via a shared helper task file that clears Ansible facts before each role run, ensuring the role gathers required facts itself and supporting optional public variable export and controlled failure handling.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Introduce a reusable helper task file to clear Ansible facts and run the tlog role with optional public vars and custom failure handling.
  • Add tests/tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml which first executes meta: clear_facts and then includes the linux-system-roles.tlog role
  • Implement __sr_tasks_from, __sr_public, and __sr_failed_when parameters to control tasks_from, public var export, and failure handling semantics
  • Use a block/rescue wrapper to simulate include_role with failed_when: false by swallowing failures when __sr_failed_when is explicitly false and running the role normally otherwise
tests/tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml
Refactor existing tests to call the tlog role through the new helper task instead of using roles/import_role directly, and ensure public vars are exported where needed.
  • Update tests_sssd.yml test cases to replace direct import_role calls with include_tasks: tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml, passing __sr_public: true for scenarios that rely on role-exported variables
  • Change tests_cockpit.yml to run the role using the helper task for both with and without cockpit cases, passing __sr_public: true so tests can access role variables
  • Modify tests_default.yml to remove the roles section and gather_facts configuration, and instead run the tlog role via the helper task under tasks
  • Adjust tests_default_vars.yml to invoke the tlog role through the helper task with __sr_public: true before asserting that all variables are defined
  • Update tests_example.yml to drop the roles section and run the README example via the helper task under tasks
tests/tests_sssd.yml
tests/tests_cockpit.yml
tests/tests_default.yml
tests/tests_default_vars.yml
tests/tests_example.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • Switching from roles:/import_role to include_tasks: run_role_with_clear_facts.yml changes the default public behavior of the role, so it’s worth double-checking all call sites that rely on role-exported variables and explicitly pass __sr_public: true there (or set a default inside run_role_with_clear_facts.yml).
  • The debug in the rescue block of run_role_with_clear_facts.yml will fire on every ignored failure and may add a lot of noise to test output; consider adding a verbosity parameter or a more concise message so failures are still traceable without overwhelming logs.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Switching from `roles:`/`import_role` to `include_tasks: run_role_with_clear_facts.yml` changes the default `public` behavior of the role, so it’s worth double-checking all call sites that rely on role-exported variables and explicitly pass `__sr_public: true` there (or set a default inside `run_role_with_clear_facts.yml`).
- The `debug` in the rescue block of `run_role_with_clear_facts.yml` will fire on every ignored failure and may add a lot of noise to test output; consider adding a `verbosity` parameter or a more concise message so failures are still traceable without overwhelming logs.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@richm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

richm commented Mar 20, 2026

[citest]

@richm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

richm commented Mar 20, 2026

[citest]

…s before include_role

The role gathers the facts it uses.  For example, if the user uses
`ANSIBLE_GATHERING=explicit`, the role uses the `setup` module with the
facts and subsets it requires.

This change allows us to test this.  Before every role invocation, the test
will use `meta: clear_facts` so that the role starts with no facts.

Create a task file tests/tasks/run_role_with_clear_facts.yml to do the tasks
to clear the facts and run the role.  Note that this means we don't need to
use `gather_facts` for the tests.

Some vars defined using `ansible_facts` have been changed to be defined with
`set_fact` instead.  This is because of the fact that `vars` are lazily
evaluated - the var might be referenced when the facts have been cleared, and
will issue an error like `ansible_facts["distribution"] is undefined`.  This is
typically done for blocks that have a `when` condition that uses `ansible_facts`
and the block has a role invocation using run_role_with_clear_facts.yml
These have been rewritten to define the `when` condition using `set_fact`.  This
is because the `when` condition is evaluated every time a task is invoked in the
block, and if the facts are cleared, this will raise an undefined variable error.

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
@richm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

richm commented Mar 20, 2026

[citest]

@richm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

richm commented Mar 20, 2026

[citest_bad]

@richm richm merged commit a7e4a8c into linux-system-roles:main Mar 20, 2026
28 checks passed
@richm richm deleted the clear_facts branch March 20, 2026 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant