Skip to content

Add Android support #136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
stackotter wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add Android support #136

stackotter wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

@stackotter
Copy link
Collaborator

@stackotter stackotter commented Jan 16, 2026 •
edited
Loading

This is a WIP. I'll fill out the description once things are bit more complete.

Todo

  • Resolve Android Swift SDK path ourself, cause SwiftPM isn't good at choosing when there are multiple Android SDKs installed, and it doesn't ensure that the SDK was built with the toolchain currently being used. If we also implement Swift toolchain discovery, then we could probably automatically locate valid toolchain/Android Swift SDK combinations in most valid setups.
  • Support metadata insertion on Android (requires being able to locate SDKs ourselves).
  • APK bundling
  • Make target Android API version configurable

@stackotter stackotter force-pushed the stackotter/android_support branch from a32e5a9 to cf0f10e Compare January 16, 2026 04:49
@stackotter
Add support for armv7 architecture (for older Android devices)
962183a
@stackotter
Set soname of 'executable as dylib' .so files to fix Android linking
15953a0 
Without this, the Android build system links with the absolute path
of the file on my laptop, which of course leads to a crash when run
on my Android device.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@stackotter