Skip to content

Conversation

@multiarc
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@multiarc multiarc requested a review from Copilot July 12, 2025 02:27

This comment was marked as outdated.

@multiarc multiarc requested a review from Copilot July 12, 2025 02:31

This comment was marked as outdated.

@multiarc multiarc requested a review from Copilot July 12, 2025 02:35

This comment was marked as outdated.

@multiarc multiarc requested a review from Copilot July 12, 2025 02:38
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the Rabbit client and TcpServer to disable Nagle's algorithm for lower latency on both sides of the benchmark, updates connection endpoints to use IPAddress.Loopback, and restructures the Rabbit constructor to properly initialize dependencies.

  • Refactor Rabbit constructor, initialize fields, and set TcpClient.NoDelay
  • Change ConnectAsync to use IPAddress.Loopback and add .ConfigureAwait(false)
  • Update TcpServer listener to use IPAddress.Loopback and set NoDelay on accepted clients

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
SerializersBenchmark/Network/Rabbit.cs Changed to a normal constructor, set NoDelay, refactored serializer usage, and switched to IPAddress.Loopback
SerializersBenchmark/Network/Abstractions/TcpServer.cs Switched to IPAddress.Loopback and disable Nagle on each accepted client
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

SerializersBenchmark/Network/Rabbit.cs:41

  • Consider adding .ConfigureAwait(false) to the FlushAsync call to avoid capturing the synchronization context and maintain consistency with other async calls.
        await stream.FlushAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);

@multiarc multiarc merged commit 4b87846 into main Jul 12, 2025
3 checks passed
@multiarc multiarc deleted the feature/reduce_network_latency_tcp_no_delay branch July 12, 2025 02:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants