Add alias for renamed district Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton#410
Open
crweber-goog wants to merge 1 commit intoopencivicdata:masterfrom
Open
Add alias for renamed district Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton#410crweber-goog wants to merge 1 commit intoopencivicdata:masterfrom
crweber-goog wants to merge 1 commit intoopencivicdata:masterfrom
Conversation
The introduction of Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton was as a new name for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot and yielded no other changes, so it should be `sameAs` the latter. While it's nicely summarized at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Canadian_federal_electoral_redistribution#Quebec_3 you can find the final boundaries along with all other relevant info on the Redistribution site: https://redecoupage-redistribution-2022.ca/com/qc/fbnd/24066/index_e.aspx.
Member
|
I think you probably need to make the change in another file, as I'm pretty sure country-ca.csv gets overwritten. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The introduction of Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton was as a new name for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot and yielded no other changes, so it should be
sameAsthe latter.While it's nicely summarized at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Canadian_federal_electoral_redistribution#Quebec_3 you can find the final boundaries along with all other relevant info on the Redistribution site: https://redecoupage-redistribution-2022.ca/com/qc/fbnd/24066/index_e.aspx.