Open
Conversation
Member
|
Nice! (and sorry for the delay) I tested it on Lightshow and looks nice.
Unfortunately I don't have time now to properly review the regex :/ |
Contributor
Author
|
No problem. I realize it isn't something most people would use. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for backtick highlighting, auto-complete, etc. as an alternative to double or single quotes.
Backticks are useful for avoiding escape characters within lines of dialogue which contain both single and double quotes.
eg.
`So I said, "why can't I?"`
Rather than
"So I said, \"why can't I?\""or
'So I said, "why can\'t I?"'Renpy itself already plays nicely with backticks. It properly lints, compiles, extracts dialogue, generates translations, etc.