Skip to content

Conversation

@sususu98
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Add timestamp to the === API RESPONSE === section header in error logs
  • Timestamp is captured when the API response is received (not when the log is written)
  • Enables diagnosis of slow backend responses by comparing with request timestamp

Example Output

=== REQUEST INFO ===
Timestamp: 2026-01-27T18:18:30.366575728+08:00
...

=== API RESPONSE === (Timestamp: 2026-01-27T18:19:45.123456789+08:00)
{...response...}

The time difference between these timestamps shows actual backend response latency.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @sususu98, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a significant improvement to the logging infrastructure by embedding timestamps directly into the 'API RESPONSE' section of error logs. This enhancement provides a clear, real-time marker of when an API response was received, which is invaluable for pinpointing and analyzing backend latency issues. The changes are implemented consistently across both non-streaming and streaming log writers, ensuring that critical timing information is always available for performance diagnostics.

Highlights

  • Timestamping API Responses: The logging system now includes a timestamp in the '=== API RESPONSE ===' section header for error logs. This timestamp is captured precisely when the API response is received, not when the log entry is written.
  • Enhanced Latency Diagnosis: By comparing the newly added API response timestamp with the existing request timestamp, developers can accurately diagnose and measure backend response latency, aiding in performance analysis.
  • Refactored Logging Function: The writeAPISection function has been modified to accept an optional time.Time parameter. If provided and non-zero, this timestamp is formatted and appended to the section header.
  • Streaming Log Support: For streaming logs, a new field apiResponseTimestamp was added to the FileStreamingLogWriter struct to store the response reception time, ensuring consistent timestamping across different logging scenarios.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request successfully implements the feature to add a timestamp to the === API RESPONSE === section in error logs. The timestamp is correctly captured when the API response is received and formatted using time.RFC3339Nano for precision. The changes are well-contained and logically applied to both non-streaming and streaming log writers. The code is clean and adheres to Go best practices.

Add timestamp to the API RESPONSE section header to help diagnose
slow backend responses. The timestamp is captured when WriteAPIResponse
is called, allowing comparison with the request timestamp to calculate
actual backend response time.
@sususu98 sususu98 force-pushed the feat/log-api-response-timestamp branch from 3e724c7 to 3488006 Compare January 28, 2026 09:36
@sususu98 sususu98 closed this Jan 29, 2026
@sususu98
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #1300 with improved implementation:

  • Fixed REQUEST INFO timestamp (now captured at request arrival, not log write time)
  • Fixed API RESPONSE timestamp (now captured when response arrives, not at log write time)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant