feat: catchain overview#1002
Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Co-authored-by: Novus Nota <68142933+novusnota@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Yes, definitely I can do that 👌 |
I have updated the gifs and added dark mode as well |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new Catchain overview documentation page, inserts it into the Consensus navigation before the visualizer, refines the Catchain visualizer metadata and simulation notes, and extends the custom dictionary with protocol-specific terms. ChangesCatchain Documentation Updates
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
ESLint skipped: no ESLint configuration detected in root package.json. To enable, add Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@Shvandre take a look, please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@foundations/consensus/catchain-overview.mdx`:
- Line 48: Update the sentence that currently states the `seqno` is incremented
"after each round" to say it is incremented "after each sent message" so it
matches the earlier definition that `seqno` counts messages sent by a node;
update the text in the Catchain overview where `seqno` is described and ensure
any adjacent reference (e.g., the "Handling Byzantine nodes" link) remains
correct and consistent with the per-message increment semantics.
- Around line 82-83: The sentence describing fork handling contains a duplicated
trailing word ("messages") which makes it hard to parse; update the sentence
that currently reads "...as well as all messages that depend on `(A, j) where j
>= i` messages." by removing the extra "messages" so it ends "...as well as all
messages that depend on `(A, j) where j >= i`." and ensure spacing and
punctuation around `(A, j)` remain correct; refer to the fork example using the
identifier `(A; i)` to locate the sentence.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 79ec8649-7a0c-4c7e-a38b-aaca5cad30ff
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
resources/images/foundations/catchain-dark.gifis excluded by!**/*.gifresources/images/foundations/catchain-light.gifis excluded by!**/*.gif
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs.jsonfoundations/consensus/catchain-overview.mdxfoundations/consensus/catchain-visualizer.mdxresources/dictionaries/custom.txt
novusnota
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll tentatively approve and merge this. Everyone, thanks for the work done on this pull request! ❤️
If any issues are spotted later, let's resolve them in another PR.
Closes #986
Summary by CodeRabbit