Support classic for loops - #182
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vrugtehagel
force-pushed
the
classic-for-loop
branch
from
July 10, 2026 12:10
6898ce0 to
b578919
Compare
Supports classic initializer-condition-incrementer-style for loops. They must start with either `let ` or `var ` to disambiguate between for...of. The latter currently doesn't support `let` or `var` (or `const`) keywords so this is a backwards-compatible change that has minimal performance impact.
Member
|
That's great. Thank you! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Supports classic initializer-condition-incrementer-style for loops. They must start with either
letorvarto disambiguate between for...of. The latter currently doesn't supportletorvar(orconst) keywords so this is a backwards-compatible change that has minimal performance impact.Resolves #173