Use sets instead of hashamps for the spillmaps (attempt #2)#304
Merged
ltratt merged 1 commit intoykjit:mainfrom Feb 2, 2026
Merged
Use sets instead of hashamps for the spillmaps (attempt #2)#304ltratt merged 1 commit intoykjit:mainfrom
ltratt merged 1 commit intoykjit:mainfrom
Conversation
Merged
|
At some points this PR says "should" but I don't know if that means "can if you want" or "absolutely must". Can we force push a change which clarifies what is meant (i.e. avoiding the most dangerous word in the English language :p). |
The spillmap analysis has been a consistent source of bugs, mostly (in
my opinion) due to the choice of data structures.
This change moves from a hashmap-centric representation to a set-based
one. This is much less error prone and easier to understand than our
previous hashmap-based method. It's also more compact.
For example, before if we had:
{
rax -> {rbx, rcx},
rbx -> {rax, rcx},
rcx -> {rax, rbx},
r11 -> {rbp-16},
// no `rbp-16 -> {r11}` because hashmap keyed by register!
}
Now it is stored as:
[
{rax, rbx, rcx},
{r11, rbp-16}
]
This fixes some broken benchmarks in an upcoming optimisation branch I
have locally.
Author
|
Force pushed. If it looks OK I'll re-sync the yk-side. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The spillmap analysis has been a consistent source of bugs, mostly (in my opinion) due to the choice of data structures.
This change moves from a hashmap-centric representation to a set-based one. This is much less error prone and easier to understand than our previous hashmap-based method. It's also more compact.
For example, before if we had:
{
rax -> {rbx, rcx},
rbx -> {rax, rcx},
rcx -> {rax, rbx},
r11 -> {rbp-16},
// no
rbp-16 -> {r11}because hashmap keyed by register!}
Now it is stored as:
[
{rax, rbx, rcx},
{r11, rbp-16}
]
This fixes some broken benchmarks in an upcoming optimisation branch I have locally.